^^^^
to moondog. yes, correct. if the cac is interested in doing a good a job as it can to represent the public's interests, no worries.

to canaan. what's a DL?

_________________
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy. ~Milan Kundera

This is the goal.

When the skills park presentation was first given, a few of us were told directly (as well as after the presentation, in other meetings) that if we wanted things to fly, the CAC had to be behind them because the CAC is the key to the park.

I know these people have put many more years into the park than I and I am appreciative for that, however, it is still not their park.

I am not familiar with DMM or LPQ CAC but for MTRP, many of their members have been and still are political heavyweights . A few with roots in varied organizations and boards throughout the city... I should say... deeply rooted.

Quite honestly, with 2.5-3 years of dropping by various meetings there, this is the most interest I've seen in the park and that is good.