Happy hunting!
| Dirt Treaders https://dirttreaders.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Find the Beer https://dirttreaders.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=14359 |
Page 40 of 44 |
| Author: | Kimba [ Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Happy hunting! |
|
| Author: | Kimba [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Had some free time this afternoon, so I'm upping the ante..    
|
|
| Author: | Ld00d [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
oh my |
|
| Author: | avidtest [ Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Oh man, I gotta get out there! 
|
|
| Author: | Belizean [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
'xplain this... 
|
|
| Author: | avidtest [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
I see Harley with an expression of butthurt, but his partner in crime has a shit-eating grin on his face. Something does not add up. There's more to this story... and I'm anxious to hear about it. |
|
| Author: | Big Clyde [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Belizean wrote: 'xplain this... HEY! There's someone else involved here! There is still another beer there. 
|
|
| Author: | Ld00d [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
looks like you took the wrong beer |
|
| Author: | Kimba [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Big Clyde wrote: There is still another beer there. Ah yes, the plan is working... |
|
| Author: | Belizean [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 9:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Belizean wrote: 'xplain this... What's the rule on this, If I drink one of the two beers, do I have to replace it?  Bob almost died CLASSIC
|
|
| Author: | Kimba [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Since I am not the OP, I will defer to Canaan's interpretation as the framer. That said, I offer the following maxim of interpretation: Finding the beer follows the rule of the virus. Accordingly, as a corollary to the previous clarification of the rule in the event one beer is consumed by several (i.e., "diffusion of responsibility does not excuse the duty to replace, there should be multiple beers hidden by now"); if several beers are hidden in one location, and only one is consumed by several persons, all those persons must hide other beers in a number equal to the consuming persons in a location or locations at least one hill or meadow away from the site of the find. So, Belizean, 2 beers; Big Clyde, 1 beer; Lost One, 1 beer.
|
|
| Author: | Big Clyde [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Kimba wrote: Since I am not the OP, I will defer to Canaan's interpretation as the framer. That said, I offer the following maxim of interpretation: Finding the beer follows the rule of the virus. Accordingly, as a corollary to the previous clarification of the rule in the event one beer is consumed by several (i.e., "diffusion of responsibility does not excuse the duty to replace, there should be multiple beers hidden by now"); if several beers are hidden in one location, and only one is consumed by several persons, all those persons must hide other beers in a number equal to the consuming persons in a location or locations at least one hill or meadow away from the site of the find. So, Belizean, 2 beers; Big Clyde, 1 beer; Lost One, 1 beer. Huh?
|
|
| Author: | Belizean [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Big Clyde wrote: Kimba wrote: Since I am not the OP, I will defer to Canaan's interpretation as the framer. That said, I offer the following maxim of interpretation: Finding the beer follows the rule of the virus. Accordingly, as a corollary to the previous clarification of the rule in the event one beer is consumed by several (i.e., "diffusion of responsibility does not excuse the duty to replace, there should be multiple beers hidden by now"); if several beers are hidden in one location, and only one is consumed by several persons, all those persons must hide other beers in a number equal to the consuming persons in a location or locations at least one hill or meadow away from the site of the find. So, Belizean, 2 beers; Big Clyde, 1 beer; Lost One, 1 beer. Huh? BAN THE LAWYERS.....BAN THEM! |
|
| Author: | avidtest [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
Kimba wrote: Since I am not the OP, I will defer to Canaan's interpretation as the framer. That said, I offer the following maxim of interpretation: Finding the beer follows the rule of the virus. Accordingly, as a corollary to the previous clarification of the rule in the event one beer is consumed by several (i.e., "diffusion of responsibility does not excuse the duty to replace, there should be multiple beers hidden by now"); if several beers are hidden in one location, and only one is consumed by several persons, all those persons must hide other beers in a number equal to the consuming persons in a location or locations at least one hill or meadow away from the site of the find. So, Belizean, 2 beers; Big Clyde, 1 beer; Lost One, 1 beer. I love it. Let it be written, let it be done. Four beers. Get to work boys! |
|
| Author: | Dirtrider [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Find the Beer |
No ban hammer should drop based on ones occupation or many of us would not be able to post here.That would ruin the spirit of what DT brings to the world. After reading the free legal counsel given to this board and his unbiased finding based solely on historical data from the point of the post conception that all parties should place a beer (one un-named person needs to place two) I think that his ruling should stand. Those that agree, say yea Those that oppose, go %$#@ yourself
|
|
| Page 40 of 44 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|